By Arjuna Parakrama
This research establishes the discriminatory and elitist nature of normal languages and standardization itself, contemplating as counter-example the case of Sri Lankan English as symptomatic of the opposite or post-colonial Englishes. at the foundation of this knowing of the traditional, whereas whilst accepting the need of criteria, besides the fact that attenuated, the author argues for the energetic broadening of the normal to incorporate the best sort attainable - privileging that means over different principles - and holds that this could in truth paintings in the direction of extending the boundaries of linguistic tolerance.
Read Online or Download De-Hegemonizing Language Standards: Learning from (Post) Colonial Englishes about English PDF
Similar criticism & theory books
Voices of Russian Literature provides in-depth interviews with ten of the main attention-grabbing figures writing in Russian at the present time. those figures variety from tested authors similar to Andrei Bitov and Ludmilla Petrushevskaya, who all started their careers within the post-Stalinist thaw of the Fifties, to novices like Viktor Pelevin, hailed as the most unique writers of the current period.
Thomas Traherne (1637? - 1674), a priest of the Church of britain through the recovery, used to be little recognized till the early 20th century, while his poetry and Centuries of Meditations have been came across. there were in view that miscellaneous guides of his poetry and devotional writings. The Works of Thomas Traherne brings jointly all of Traherne's extant works in a definitive, revealed variation for the 1st time.
? “Remarkably, writes Ted Atkinson, ? “during a interval approximately such as the good melancholy, Faulkner wrote the novels and tales usually learn, taught, and tested through students. this is often the 1st accomplished research to contemplate his so much acclaimed works within the context of these tough occasions.
Glickman argues that early immigrants to Canada introduced with them the expectancy that nature will be grand, mysterious, notable - even terrifying - and welcomed scenes that conformed to those notions of sublimity. She contends that to interpret their descriptions of nature as "negative," as such a lot of critics have performed, is an important false impression.
- Pirates? The Politics of Plunder, 1550-1650 (Early Modern Literature in History)
- In Other Words: Coursebk CL Baker
- Contemporary Literary Theory and the Reading of Poetry
- An Anthology of Russian Literature from Earliest Writings to Modern Fiction: Introduction to a Culture
- The Cambridge introduction to twentieth-century American poetry
Additional resources for De-Hegemonizing Language Standards: Learning from (Post) Colonial Englishes about English
SAE is an idealization. Nobody speaks this dialect, and if somebody did, we wouldn't know it because SAE is not defined precisely. Several years ago there actually was an entire conference devoted to one subject: a precise definition of SAE. This convocation of scholars did not succeed in satisfying everyone as to what SAE should be. 14 This 'typical' introductory text goes on to describe the process by which certain dialects become favoured, a 'development' justified in the most naturalistic terms that dissimulate the struggle that takes place in and on language among differing interest groups.
It is in his questioning of the systemicness of these other varieties of English that Prator raises the most fundamental, if misguided, objection to their legitimacy. Referring to his obvious bete noire, Indian English, Prator writes: the rub is that very few speakers limit their aberrancies to the widely shared features: each individual typically adds in his (sic) own speech a large and idiosyncratic collection of features reflecting his particular native language, educational background, and personal temperament, (p.
This standard needs to be broadened, it needs to be continually revised, and even then it is not to be entirely trusted, but whether we like it or not, it remains more or less in place. The standard is in effect, and is based, however loosely, on shared assumptions and on a network of mechanisms such as the school system, a common historical narrative, and, perhaps most importantly, the conservative consequences of printing and communication technology which literally fixes the language. At least, this is what seems to be the case.
De-Hegemonizing Language Standards: Learning from (Post) Colonial Englishes about English by Arjuna Parakrama