By Dylan Glynn, Justyna A. Robinson
This quantity seeks to strengthen and popularise using corpus-driven quantitative tools within the examine of semantics. the 1st half offers cutting-edge study in polysemy and synonymy from a Cognitive Linguistic viewpoint. the second one half provides and explains in a didactic demeanour all the statistical innovations utilized in the 1st a part of the quantity. A guide either for linguists operating with facts in corpus examine and for linguists within the fields of polysemy and synonymy.
Read or Download Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy PDF
Similar semantics books
The shaping of advanced meanings is dependent upon punctual and relational coding and inferencing. Coding is seen as a vector that may run both from expression to content material or from strategies to (linguistic) kinds to mark self sufficient conceptual relatives. whereas coding is determined by systematic assets inner to language, inferencing primarily relies on a layered method of self reliant shared conceptual constructions, which come with either cognitive versions and consistency standards grounded in a traditional ontology.
This publication offers with the translation of adverbially quantified sentences containing yes DPs and loose kinfolk (FR) Thereby, it concentrates at the origins of Quantificational Variability results (QVEs), i. e. readings in keeping with which the respective quantificational adverb turns out to quantify over the participants denoted via the respective DP/FR.
Cautious writers and audio system agree that clichés are often to be refrained from. notwithstanding, the vast majority of us proceed to exploit them. Why do they persist in our language? In it has been stated ahead of, lexicographer Orin Hargraves examines the odd inspiration and gear of the cliché. He is helping readers comprehend why definite words grew to become clichés and why they need to be refrained from -- or why they nonetheless have existence left in them.
The final target of this booklet is to boost a Gricean theoretical framework of traditional implicature in which chinese language pragmatic markers will be accommodated. It has associated goals. to begin with it units out to enhance a thought of traditional implicature. traditional implicature is itself a hugely debatable time period, understood very in a different way via a variety of manufacturers of latest pragmatic idea, and is a pivotal suggestion within the debates among the Gricean and Neo-Gricean theorists at the one hand and proponents of Relevance concept at the different.
- People in Quandaries: The Semantics of Personal Adjustment
- Historical Semantics and Cognition
- Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Aspect (Explorations in Semantics)
- Chick Lit: The Stylistics of Cappuccino Fiction
- Nouveaux developpements de l'imparfait (Cahiers Chronos 14)
Additional info for Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy
03kit 33 34 Dylan Glynn Klavan, J. (2012). Converging and diverging evidence: Corpus-linguistic and experimental methods for studying grammatical synonymy. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tartu. Kleiber, G. (1990). Sémantique du prototype: Catégorie et sens lexical. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Kleiber, G. (1999). Problèmes de sémantique: La polysémie en questions. Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion. Krawczak, K. (2014a). Epistemic stance predicates in English: A quantitative corpus-driven study of subjectivity.
Cognitive Linguistics in the redwoods. The expansion of a new paradigm. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1515/9783110811421 Chaffin, R. (1992). The concept of a semantic relation. In A. Lehrer, & E. ), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organisation (pp. 253–288). London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cienki, A. (1998). Straight: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 107–150. , & Kay, P. (1981). Prototype semantics: The English word lie.
Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. 1207/s15516709cog1201_2 Taylor, J. (1988). Contrasting prepositional categories: English and Italian. In B. ), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 299–326). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. , & MacLaury, R. (1995). Language and the cognitive construal of the world. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1515/9783110809305 Taylor, J. (1989a). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Taylor, J. (1989b). Possessive genitives in English.
Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy by Dylan Glynn, Justyna A. Robinson